 |
 |
 |
 |
WELLMAN INC: Panel Seeks Inquiry on $375 Mil. Refinancing Deal
The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors in Wellman Inc. and its debtor-affiliates' bankruptcy cases seeks permission from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York to compel the Debtors to appear for oral examination pursuant to Rule 2004(d) of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure.
The Creditors Committee wants to examine the Debtors concerning a transaction in 2004 wherein Wellman Inc., refinanced about $375,000,000, in outstanding unsecured debt, which had resulted in the Debtors accumulating secured debt.
Mark Somerstein, Esq., at Ropes & Gray LLP, in New York, recounts Wellman, Inc., incurred the outstanding debt under a loan agreement dated June 27, 2003, and three other unsecured note agreements. The company managed to refinance its debt through the Credit Agreement, First Lien Senior Credit Agreement, and the Second Lien Senior Credit Agreement it reached with its lenders.
The Committee has discovered that at the time of the refinancing, the outstanding debt was primarily unsecured and was the obligation of Wellman and a few of its subsidiaries. After the deal, however, the lenders imposed $675,000,000 of secured debt on Wellman's entire capital structure, including obligations for such debt on all the subsidiaries, Mr. Somerstein recounts.
The Committee avers that the liens and guarantees in connection with the transaction may be avoidable as fraudulent conveyances. "It has not been evidenced that Wellman's direct and indirect subsidiaries received any benefit from incurring the secured debt, obligations that likely rendered the subsidiaries insolvent," Mr. Somerstein points out.
The Creditors Committee, through its financial advisor FTI Consulting, Inc., has asked the Debtors for information needed to evaluate the transaction and the alleged fraudulent transfer claims. The Debtors, however, provided limited information and did not further contact FTI when they would provide additional information.
In connection with the examination, the Creditors Committee demands that the Debtors to produce:
(1) documents concerning the three refinancing agreements including collateral and ancillary documents;
(2) documents concerning any debt, note, bond or debt obligation, except payments to suppliers of goods or services, of any Debtor or Wellman's subsidiary that had been repaid, changed or eliminated with the proceeds of the refinancing agreements;
(3) documents relating to uses of the proceeds of the refinancing agreements, except payments to suppliers of goods or services;
(4) financial statements for any Debtor or Wellman's subsidiary for the period Jan. 1, 2003, to the present;
(5) documents concerning the transfers between any Debtor or Wellman's subsidiary for the period Jan. 1, 2003, to the present;
(6) complete corporate organization chart showing for each business entity, the name, business purpose, and financial obligations for the period Jan. 1, 2003, to the present;
(7) federal and state tax returns of each Debtor or Wellman's subsidiary for the period Jan. 1, 2003, to the present; and
(8) appraisals concerning the assets purchased through the proceeds of the refinancing transaction, except for purchases made in the ordinary course of business.
The absolute priority rule under the Bankruptcy Code prevents unsecured creditors from receiving distributions before secured creditors are paid in full, to the extent of the value of their collateral. However, to the extent the Committee obtains avoidance of the secured creditors' liens or reclassification of their claims to unsecured, potential recovery by unsecured creditors may increase.
Committee Wants Liens' Challenge Period Extended
The Creditors Committee further asks the Court to extend to August 29, 2008, the deadline for challenging the stipulations or other provisions in the final order approving the Debtors' postpetition financing.
To recall, the final DIP order established June 8, 2008, as the deadline for challenging any of its provisions, including the Debtors' agreement that no portion of the obligations as well as liens and security interests granted under the Revolving Credit Agreement will be subject to avoidance, recharacterization, recovery or subordination.
If no challenge is brought on or before the deadline, the obligations and liens under the refinancing agreements will not be subject to avoidance.
About Wellman
Headquartered in Fort Mill, South Carolina, Wellman Inc. -- http://www.wellmaninc.com/ -- manufactures and markets packaging and engineering resins used in food and beverage packaging, apparel, home furnishings and automobiles. They manufacture resins and polyester staple fiber a three major production facilities.
The company and its debtor-affiliates filed for Chapter 11 protection on Feb. 22, 2008 (Bankr. S.D. N.Y. Case No. 08-10595). Jonathan S. Henes, Esq., at Kirkland & Ellis, LLP, in New York City, represents the Debtors.
Wellman Inc., in its bankruptcy petition, listed total assets of $124,277,177 and total liabilities of $600,084,885, as of Dec. 31, 2007, on a stand-alone basis. Debtor-affiliate ALG, Inc., listed assets between $500 million and $1 billion on a stand-alone basis at the time of the bankruptcy filing. Debtor-affiliates Fiber Industries Inc., Prince Inc., and Wellman of Mississippi Inc., listed assets between $100 million and $500 million at the time of their bankruptcy filings.
On a consolidated basis, Wellman Inc., and its debtor-affiliates listed $498,867,323 in assets and $684,221,655 in liabilities as of Jan. 31, 2008.
(Wellman Bankruptcy News, Issue No. 11; Bankruptcy Creditors' Service Inc., http://bankrupt.com/newsstand/ or 215/945-7000)
|
 |
|
 |
|